<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should poison bear a heksher?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kosherblog.net/2006/07/12/should-poison-bear-a-heksher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2006/07/12/should-poison-bear-a-heksher/</link>
	<description>Finding the finer side of everyday kosher living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:46:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alfiesaden</title>
		<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2006/07/12/should-poison-bear-a-heksher/comment-page-1/#comment-100994</link>
		<dc:creator>alfiesaden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 11:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kosherblog.net/?p=928#comment-100994</guid>
		<description>hi - is it just me !! can any one explain why  when i type in the  bing  browser &quot;www.kosherblog.net&quot;  i get a different site yet whe i type it in google its ok? could this be a bug in my system or is any one else having same probs ?          
 alfie saden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi &#8211; is it just me !! can any one explain why  when i type in the  bing  browser &#8220;www.kosherblog.net&#8221;  i get a different site yet whe i type it in google its ok? could this be a bug in my system or is any one else having same probs ?<br />
 alfie saden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2006/07/12/should-poison-bear-a-heksher/comment-page-1/#comment-86943</link>
		<dc:creator>T.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 21:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kosherblog.net/?p=928#comment-86943</guid>
		<description>One of the major uses of rubbing alcohol is cleaning of an open wound, so though it does not go through the digestive system, it can go ino the body.  Could it hurt for it to be kosher?  I can&#039;t imagine that a kosher symbol could tempt someone to drink it, unless that person were illiterate;  a description of rubbing alcohol as dangerous to ingest also appears on the bottle, along with a description of the exact types of harm that it can cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the major uses of rubbing alcohol is cleaning of an open wound, so though it does not go through the digestive system, it can go ino the body.  Could it hurt for it to be kosher?  I can&#8217;t imagine that a kosher symbol could tempt someone to drink it, unless that person were illiterate;  a description of rubbing alcohol as dangerous to ingest also appears on the bottle, along with a description of the exact types of harm that it can cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meir rabi</title>
		<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2006/07/12/should-poison-bear-a-heksher/comment-page-1/#comment-20904</link>
		<dc:creator>meir rabi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kosherblog.net/?p=928#comment-20904</guid>
		<description>An often heard comment: “If we had a choice between two soaps, one made from pig fat and the other soap from vegetable fat, would we not or should we not prefer to use the non-pig-fat soap?”

Indeed most or many would prefer the non-pig-fat soap but that is not a Halachic answer. That response is what must be identified as a societal response that actually says more about the mindset of our community than about the facts of Halachah. In fact one might reflect that it says more about our suffering the distortion of misrepresented Halachic standards of Kosher than about naiveté, pietism or integrity.

Things That Can Not be Not Kosher
According to Halachah soap can not be considered non-Kosher under any circumstances. Meaning even if one eats it, it is not relevant to the Halachos of Kosher and non-Kosher. Kosher and non-Kosher apply only to foods and soap is not a food.

So, even if, as often happens in the heated discussions that revolve around these matters, we feel threatened by the risk of residual soap remaining on a dish and eventually finding its way into our mouth and gullet; we must know that this is a furphy. It is a not a food and therefore entirely irrelevant to the question of Kashrus.

Kosher Soap is Used for Brain-Washing
However little blame there is to lay at the feet of the average Kosher consumer, there is a heavy burden to be levelled against the Kosher agencies that promote this misguided imagery by misleadingly placing their Kosher marks on a host of products such as bleach and soap. Without doubt, this fosters in the minds of many well meaning Kosher consumers a false belief that even non-foods require Kosher supervision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An often heard comment: “If we had a choice between two soaps, one made from pig fat and the other soap from vegetable fat, would we not or should we not prefer to use the non-pig-fat soap?”</p>
<p>Indeed most or many would prefer the non-pig-fat soap but that is not a Halachic answer. That response is what must be identified as a societal response that actually says more about the mindset of our community than about the facts of Halachah. In fact one might reflect that it says more about our suffering the distortion of misrepresented Halachic standards of Kosher than about naiveté, pietism or integrity.</p>
<p>Things That Can Not be Not Kosher<br />
According to Halachah soap can not be considered non-Kosher under any circumstances. Meaning even if one eats it, it is not relevant to the Halachos of Kosher and non-Kosher. Kosher and non-Kosher apply only to foods and soap is not a food.</p>
<p>So, even if, as often happens in the heated discussions that revolve around these matters, we feel threatened by the risk of residual soap remaining on a dish and eventually finding its way into our mouth and gullet; we must know that this is a furphy. It is a not a food and therefore entirely irrelevant to the question of Kashrus.</p>
<p>Kosher Soap is Used for Brain-Washing<br />
However little blame there is to lay at the feet of the average Kosher consumer, there is a heavy burden to be levelled against the Kosher agencies that promote this misguided imagery by misleadingly placing their Kosher marks on a host of products such as bleach and soap. Without doubt, this fosters in the minds of many well meaning Kosher consumers a false belief that even non-foods require Kosher supervision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari</title>
		<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2006/07/12/should-poison-bear-a-heksher/comment-page-1/#comment-16715</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kosherblog.net/?p=928#comment-16715</guid>
		<description>Soap does not require a hechsher because it is not food. If a particular type of soap were edible (which could be possible, although unlikely, I suppose), then it would be non-kosher if it contained significant non-kosher ingredients. However, any ingredient present in less than 1/60 shouldn&#039;t be a problem since it is clearly not added for taste (unless the product is advertised as being edible or tasty). Edible means that even a dog might eat it (although this is kind of a vague standard).

So, I suppose a hechsher on something like soap might be justifiable on the basis that soap could conceivably be edible. The hechsher serves to tell us that this soap is either not edible, or it is is made entirely of kosher ingredients. Something like aluminum foil seems more problematic because that is clearly not edible, but I wonder if foils are ever coated with a film of some edible substance. Again, I think that is very unlikely, but I don&#039;t know much about that industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soap does not require a hechsher because it is not food. If a particular type of soap were edible (which could be possible, although unlikely, I suppose), then it would be non-kosher if it contained significant non-kosher ingredients. However, any ingredient present in less than 1/60 shouldn&#8217;t be a problem since it is clearly not added for taste (unless the product is advertised as being edible or tasty). Edible means that even a dog might eat it (although this is kind of a vague standard).</p>
<p>So, I suppose a hechsher on something like soap might be justifiable on the basis that soap could conceivably be edible. The hechsher serves to tell us that this soap is either not edible, or it is is made entirely of kosher ingredients. Something like aluminum foil seems more problematic because that is clearly not edible, but I wonder if foils are ever coated with a film of some edible substance. Again, I think that is very unlikely, but I don&#8217;t know much about that industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sioux</title>
		<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2006/07/12/should-poison-bear-a-heksher/comment-page-1/#comment-16537</link>
		<dc:creator>sioux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kosherblog.net/?p=928#comment-16537</guid>
		<description>Does this mean ANY soap can be cosidered Kosher and used in Shul.....what about additives E numbers/colourings that permeate the entire product...but may technically be compliant with the 1/60 the `general rule`....not to mention unethical animal testing ....soaps and shampoos squirted into the eyes of rabbits to check for irritation to eyes and membranes/skins of humans.......even if the product is no longer tested, it was initially...how do we stand on using a product some 20 years after cruel and unecessary testing was stopped?

Thanks
Sioux</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean ANY soap can be cosidered Kosher and used in Shul&#8230;..what about additives E numbers/colourings that permeate the entire product&#8230;but may technically be compliant with the 1/60 the `general rule`&#8230;.not to mention unethical animal testing &#8230;.soaps and shampoos squirted into the eyes of rabbits to check for irritation to eyes and membranes/skins of humans&#8230;&#8230;.even if the product is no longer tested, it was initially&#8230;how do we stand on using a product some 20 years after cruel and unecessary testing was stopped?</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Sioux</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellyn Hirsch</title>
		<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2006/07/12/should-poison-bear-a-heksher/comment-page-1/#comment-3322</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellyn Hirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kosherblog.net/?p=928#comment-3322</guid>
		<description>Great info.  Thank you.  I was concerned because I cleaned my oven (while it was still hot), with a cleanser that didn&#039;t have a hechsher, and I thought that I treifed it as well as my countertops that I sprayed this cleanser on.  I feel so much better.  Thank you and Good Shabbos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info.  Thank you.  I was concerned because I cleaned my oven (while it was still hot), with a cleanser that didn&#8217;t have a hechsher, and I thought that I treifed it as well as my countertops that I sprayed this cleanser on.  I feel so much better.  Thank you and Good Shabbos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Price</title>
		<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2006/07/12/should-poison-bear-a-heksher/comment-page-1/#comment-3321</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kosherblog.net/?p=928#comment-3321</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe any of the certifier. They certify they get money but if something is wrong with the product we can&#039;t blame them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe any of the certifier. They certify they get money but if something is wrong with the product we can&#8217;t blame them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChaimW</title>
		<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2006/07/12/should-poison-bear-a-heksher/comment-page-1/#comment-3320</link>
		<dc:creator>ChaimW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kosherblog.net/?p=928#comment-3320</guid>
		<description>The supervising agencies, and the largest one in particular, have created an industry out of thin air and have ultimately done Judaism a large disservice - not a service.  This is what a rav is for.

It is a pet peeve of mine that things that were universally kosher in the old days are no longer acceptable because they don&#039;t have a supervising agency, eg, many shnaps and fish from a non-Jew.  This is madness and it ain&#039;t cheap.  And I don&#039;t buy that trash that they protect the unwitting consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The supervising agencies, and the largest one in particular, have created an industry out of thin air and have ultimately done Judaism a large disservice &#8211; not a service.  This is what a rav is for.</p>
<p>It is a pet peeve of mine that things that were universally kosher in the old days are no longer acceptable because they don&#8217;t have a supervising agency, eg, many shnaps and fish from a non-Jew.  This is madness and it ain&#8217;t cheap.  And I don&#8217;t buy that trash that they protect the unwitting consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Rappoport</title>
		<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2006/07/12/should-poison-bear-a-heksher/comment-page-1/#comment-3319</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Rappoport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kosherblog.net/?p=928#comment-3319</guid>
		<description>Andy J asked if we knew that one soap was made from pig fat and the other soap was kosher, wouldn&#039;t we rather use the kosher soap.  Most people would answer that the kosher soap is prefered.  However, that would be a sociological answer and not a halachic answer.  According to halacha, as Andy noted, one can certainly use non kosher soap on kosher dishes.  However, we do need to be careful of how we characterize our answer.  Sociological preferences are not halacha.    Second: He mentions that there could be a problem of putting a treif substance into a kosher cup thereby treifing up the cup.  Actually, that would not apply as the substance is not food and would not treif the cup because there is no issue of kashruth.  And even if it were actually treif, the cup would not be treifed (can we make up that word?).  Third- he raises the issue of a dog drinking alcohol.  That would not be relevant.  Alcohol is poison.  Do dogs drink poison or do they have some sort of animal warning system?

Part Two:  In Europe, they put out large lists of acceptable foods that have no certification.  For example, see the London Beit Din&#039;s kosher guide.  The main reason for that is that they have so few certified products by comparison to what we have here.  Yet, in spite of that, they manage to keep kosher by having a good knowledge of the products that are GRAK (generally recognized as kosher).  Over on the Kosher Nexus, we have on occasion listed many GRAK items (plain seltzer, regular tea, etc).  We need to know more about the things we buy as Jon pointed out.  Not everything needs a hechsher.  Why filtered spring water carries a hechsher is beyond me.

Part three
Every year, products come on the market with a hechsher that leaves us wondering.  In the Kosher Nexus, we wrote about KP window cleaner.  I guess if you run out of plates, you can eat off the window.  Really- KP window cleaner?  Was P T Barnum Jewish?

Part Four
I have to agree with Jon.  Rubbing Alcohol should not have a hechsher.  It frightens me that someone might drink the stuff.  And according to the research I did, it seems that people do drink the stuff all the time and end up in the hospital.  Some even die.

Part five
Easy hechsherim (like on spring water)do not cost very much, and the low fees that the hechsher company collects may be used to off set the much higher fee they might have to collect from someone else.  So, in the end, it is a trade off.  Company X pays a little, but it allows the hechsher company to subsidize Company Q.  So what could be bad?  Alcohol with a hechsher seems bad to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy J asked if we knew that one soap was made from pig fat and the other soap was kosher, wouldn&#8217;t we rather use the kosher soap.  Most people would answer that the kosher soap is prefered.  However, that would be a sociological answer and not a halachic answer.  According to halacha, as Andy noted, one can certainly use non kosher soap on kosher dishes.  However, we do need to be careful of how we characterize our answer.  Sociological preferences are not halacha.    Second: He mentions that there could be a problem of putting a treif substance into a kosher cup thereby treifing up the cup.  Actually, that would not apply as the substance is not food and would not treif the cup because there is no issue of kashruth.  And even if it were actually treif, the cup would not be treifed (can we make up that word?).  Third- he raises the issue of a dog drinking alcohol.  That would not be relevant.  Alcohol is poison.  Do dogs drink poison or do they have some sort of animal warning system?</p>
<p>Part Two:  In Europe, they put out large lists of acceptable foods that have no certification.  For example, see the London Beit Din&#8217;s kosher guide.  The main reason for that is that they have so few certified products by comparison to what we have here.  Yet, in spite of that, they manage to keep kosher by having a good knowledge of the products that are GRAK (generally recognized as kosher).  Over on the Kosher Nexus, we have on occasion listed many GRAK items (plain seltzer, regular tea, etc).  We need to know more about the things we buy as Jon pointed out.  Not everything needs a hechsher.  Why filtered spring water carries a hechsher is beyond me.</p>
<p>Part three<br />
Every year, products come on the market with a hechsher that leaves us wondering.  In the Kosher Nexus, we wrote about KP window cleaner.  I guess if you run out of plates, you can eat off the window.  Really- KP window cleaner?  Was P T Barnum Jewish?</p>
<p>Part Four<br />
I have to agree with Jon.  Rubbing Alcohol should not have a hechsher.  It frightens me that someone might drink the stuff.  And according to the research I did, it seems that people do drink the stuff all the time and end up in the hospital.  Some even die.</p>
<p>Part five<br />
Easy hechsherim (like on spring water)do not cost very much, and the low fees that the hechsher company collects may be used to off set the much higher fee they might have to collect from someone else.  So, in the end, it is a trade off.  Company X pays a little, but it allows the hechsher company to subsidize Company Q.  So what could be bad?  Alcohol with a hechsher seems bad to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muse</title>
		<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2006/07/12/should-poison-bear-a-heksher/comment-page-1/#comment-3318</link>
		<dc:creator>muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kosherblog.net/?p=928#comment-3318</guid>
		<description>Repost this before Pesach!

I always get a kick out of KP bleach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repost this before Pesach!</p>
<p>I always get a kick out of KP bleach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.kosherblog.net/2006/07/12/should-poison-bear-a-heksher/feed/ ) in 5.84403 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 12:29 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 1:29 pm UTC -->
