<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New &#8220;Product Scoresheet&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kosherblog.net/2005/02/23/new_product_scoresheet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2005/02/23/new_product_scoresheet/</link>
	<description>Finding the finer side of everyday kosher living</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: slutzman</title>
		<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2005/02/23/new_product_scoresheet/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>slutzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kosherblog.net/2005/02/23/new_product_scoresheet/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>How about a standard scheme for what the numbers mean too?  I propose that the system be skewed toward the center, with a 2 or 3 being the average.  Here's a typical 0-4 scale, slightly modified from one that we use at work:

0 -- Significantly below average
1 -- Below Average
2 -- Average
3 -- Above Average
4 -- Significantly above average

Of course, this has the consequence of scores looking low when they're actually pretty good.  For example, 2.5 across the board is slightly above average (so pretty good), but only sounds like just over half the available points.  At the same time, though, it means a heck of a lot more when a product gets a 4 or a 0.

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a standard scheme for what the numbers mean too?  I propose that the system be skewed toward the center, with a 2 or 3 being the average.  Here&#8217;s a typical 0-4 scale, slightly modified from one that we use at work:</p>
<p>0 &#8212; Significantly below average<br />
1 &#8212; Below Average<br />
2 &#8212; Average<br />
3 &#8212; Above Average<br />
4 &#8212; Significantly above average</p>
<p>Of course, this has the consequence of scores looking low when they&#8217;re actually pretty good.  For example, 2.5 across the board is slightly above average (so pretty good), but only sounds like just over half the available points.  At the same time, though, it means a heck of a lot more when a product gets a 4 or a 0.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jabbett</title>
		<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2005/02/23/new_product_scoresheet/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>jabbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kosherblog.net/2005/02/23/new_product_scoresheet/#comment-377</guid>
		<description>Just under the picture there lies your answer: 4 points each.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just under the picture there lies your answer: 4 points each.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shanna</title>
		<link>http://www.kosherblog.net/2005/02/23/new_product_scoresheet/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>shanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kosherblog.net/2005/02/23/new_product_scoresheet/#comment-376</guid>
		<description>What are the maximum possible scores in each category?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the maximum possible scores in each category?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
