Face it folks, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), like everyone else, has an agenda. They use shock footage to make unassuming folks lose their lunches in the hopes we’ll disavow the consumption of animal products and cast snide stares at the barbarians who insist on eating charred carcasses. And to pursue that agenda, they’ll cross any line: PETA’s recent use of Holocaust imagery to shame the public into forgoing meat was not merely disrespectful; it added whole universes to the word “disrespectful” (to borrow a wording of Andrew Sullivan). In case you missed it last year, PETA displayed their distinctly unethical “Holocaust on Your Plate” exhibit — likening victims of the Shoah to supermarket-destined chickens and cows — not a stone’s-throw away from the New England Holocaust Memorial. According to a Globe editorial at the time, “PETA says it seeks to be a source of conscience regarding the abuse of animals. Yet its arguments and its preposterous exhibit collapse when their members think nothing of inflicting suffering on human beings.” These folks have zero credibility in my eyes.
Right up front, that’s where I stand. So I took PETA’s accusations of “Slaughter Horrors” at Agriprocessors’ Postville, Iowa facility with a large grain of kosher salt. I choose not to give in to horror footage (Iraqi hostages, US Marines in Faluja, or otherwise), so I have not viewed the video itself, but I have read PETA’s description of conditions at the plant, and plenty of news articles. So far, I’ve found the article at the Jerusalem Post to be the most comprehensive.
I have also fully read Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser, a gripping narrative about fast food and related industries (meat, potatoes, synthetic flavors), a book which I respect and recommend. So, to show a bit of pseudo-journalistic objectivity: I similarly have very little respect for massive meat processors. Their goal is to slaughter and butcher as many animals as physically possible at the absolute least cost.
That said, if PETA’s footage is legitimate, and their accusations are verifiable, I would fully support the five, resonable recommendations outlined in PETA’s surprisingly respectable letter to the Orthodox Union to ameliorate the accused inhumane practices.
—–
Unfortunately, I’ve learned over my several years of keeping kosher that “kosher” only means “ritually fit” — it does not mean “clean,” and it does not mean “friendly,” and it does not mean “pleasant.” That can probably be said of the rest of halachah, in that one may succeed in strictly following the letter of the Torah, but end up a spiritual failure due to a lack of derech eretz.
Similarly, we must consider kosher slaughter with such terms as derech eretz and hiddur mitzvah (enhancing the commandment). The Agriprocessors folks may insist they’re operating within the letter of the law — in fact, they claim to also be operating within the spirit of the law — but that should not preclude us from continually improving our shechita technology and processes whenever possible, from going beyond the call of moral duty, even if the suggestions come from such a morally-questionable group as PETA.
Kashrut has historically been at the forefront of animal humaneness. Agriprocessors states proudly:
Long before the rest of the world showed any “common decency” to animals or had the slightest concern for the treatment of animals, the laws of the Torah and rabbinic teachings command the Jewish people to treat all living creatures humanely. Secular society — including [PETA] — has still not caught up with the precepts of Jewish law in this regard.
Even with this in mind, we can’t rest on our communal laurels. We must use our law and our history as a guide to further our commitment to humane treatment of animals, to serve as an ever greater example to others in that regard, and to make us the ones who tell PETA how to operate.
qmixs...
in Details, details...